WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) wrote a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer urging him to include conditions from their legislation, the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, during discussion of a trade deal with China.
The bill introduced would require foreign companies to comply with U.S. auditing standards by requiring them to meet the Public Accounting Oversight Board standards (PCAOB). The PCAOB is a nonprofit corporation established by Congress in 2002 that administers performance audits of public companies in order to protect investors. The PCAOB has entered into cooperative agreements with foreign regulators around the world but has not been able to reach an agreement with China.
“The current failure of China to comply with our laws and play by the same rules as everyone else puts American investors and the credibility of our markets at risk…” the senators write. “The fact that China stands alone in its noncompliance with PCAOB standards is yet another example of how it fails to play by the same rules as other countries. China’s failure to comply with our disclosure laws has already impacted investor confidence and the integrity of our financial markets.”
The full text of the letter is available here and below:
Dear Ambassador Lighthizer:
As you continue your work on a fair trade deal with the Chinese government, we urge you to include conditions in the deal that would require Chinese companies listed in the United States to comply with U.S. auditing and reporting requirements. The current failure of China to comply with our laws and play by the same rules as everyone else puts American investors and the credibility of our markets at risk. Because of this negligence, we introduced the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which we believe should be a guidepost for your negotiations with the Chinese government on this issue.
In 2005, the Public Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), began inspecting foreign auditors “in order to assess those firms’ compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the rules of the Board, the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and professional standards in connection with their performance of audits, issuance of audit reports, and related matters involving U.S. public companies, other issuers, brokers and dealers.” The PCAOB is able to inspect these firms because it entered into cooperative agreements with foreign regulators around the world.
Achieving these agreements, has not been easy, but our regulators have been able to come to an agreement with virtually every other country except for China. To put this into perspective, in 2013, the PCAOB was unable to conduct inspections of foreign auditors in 15 countries. In just six years, they have been able to come to an agreement with every country except for China and Belgium, and it is our understanding that Belgium has made meaningful progress with the PCAOB.
The fact that China stands alone in its non-compliance with PCAOB standards is yet another example of how it fails to play by the same rules as other countries. This point was underscored in December when the Chairmen of the PCAOB and the SEC said in a joint statement that “for certain China-based companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges, the SEC and PCAOB have not had access to the books and records and audit work papers to an extent consistent with other jurisdictions both in scope and timing.”
China’s failure to comply with our disclosure laws has already impacted investor confidence and the integrity of our financial markets. As you may be aware, in 2009, the U.S. markets saw a boom of Chinese companies registering on the U.S. exchanges. By circumventing our laws, many of these fraudulent companies merged with American shell companies and got access to U.S. investors without an initial inspection by the SEC. Because of this, many of these Chinese-based companies crashed in 2011. This crash, commonly referred to as the “reverse merger fraud crisis,” led to the loss of billions of dollars in market capitalization. According to a 2013 McKinsey and Company report, the losses were over $40 billion in market value.
The SEC, PCAOB, and the U.S. exchanges responded to the reverse merger crisis in a number of ways. For example, the SEC filed numerous enforcement cases against Chinese companies and their attorneys, auditors, and “gatekeepers.” Additionally, the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ delisted over 50 Chinese companies between 2011 and 2012.
Despite these actions, we still do not have complete information regarding Chinese companies listed in the U.S. In order to remedy the fact that China will not comply with our regulators, we introduced the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. Our bill would amend Sarbanes-Oxley to impose stronger requirements on SEC registered companies based in foreign countries. The bill expressly requires foreign companies that are registered with the SEC to allow the PCAOB to review their books. While the bill does not specifically name any country, it would solve this ongoing issue the PCAOB and the SEC have with China.
We ask that you include the substance of this bill in your trade negotiations with the Chinese government, in order to protect the everyday American investor. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
###
