Media

Watch Kennedy’s comments here.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) questioned why Intel announced plans to build its latest chip manufacturing facility in Ireland, rather than the United States, in a speech on the U.S. Senate floor.

Key excerpts of the speech are below: 

“The Department of Commerce gave Intel $8.9 billion cash in return for 10% of the company. Well, here’s why I think Intel might have rinky-doo’d us. Intel just announced they were taking $5 billion of that. And you know what they’re doing with it? They’re building a chip manufacturing plant in Ireland. 

“I mean, I don’t get it. And I know Intel’s going to say, ‘Well, it wasn’t the $8.9 billion that the American taxpayer gave us that we took and helped the Irish economy.’ Money is fungible, folks. Money is fungible. And they can say all they want, ‘Oh, it wasn’t American taxpayer money, it came from a different pot of money.’

“Now, if this is true, and I saw it announced publicly that they’re building a $5 billion chip manufacturing plant in Ireland after $8.9 billion of American taxpayer money was given to them, as far as I’m concerned, this deal is a breech birth.”

. . . 

“I hope I’m wrong. Intel, if you’re listening, I hope you’ll explain all of this. . . . As far as I’m concerned, the way it looks to me right now, we gave them $8.9 billion of American taxpayer money, and they said thank you very much and went and decided to spend it in Ireland. Where I come from, we call that a three-wheeled shopping cart. 

“So, Intel needs to build that manufacturing plant in America, or they need to give the American people their money back. And they need to do it now. And they need to explain to the American people.”

Watch Kennedy’s speech here.  

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, announced $6,637,673 in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding to help Louisiana communities continue recovering from Hurricanes Laura and Francine.

“Louisianians know how to weather a storm, rebuild what was lost and help their neighbors get back on their feet. This $6.6 million will help our communities recover from Hurricanes Laura and Francine and keep moving forward,” said Kennedy.

The FEMA aid will fund the following:

  • $2,218,977 to the City of Lake Charles for boardwalks, docks and piers as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $944,885 to Terrebonne Parish to fund costs related to the management of Public Assistance grants as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $912,805 to Morgan City to fund emergency electrical power restorations to lessen immediate threat to public health, safety and property as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $689,190 to South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association to fund emergency protective measures to lessen immediate threat to public health, safety and property as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $552,131 to the City of Sulphur to fund emergency protective measures to lessen the immediate threat to public health and safety as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $455,346 to the City of Lake Charles to fund lakefront sidewalks, riprap, fencing and other related components repairs or replacements as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $403,835 to the City of Sulphur to fund building and equipment repairs or replacements as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $202,872 to Morgan City to fund lift stations and other related components emergency repairs or replacements as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $150,536 to the Riverside Baptist Church of Lake Charles to fund contents replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $107,097 to Morgan City to fund signage repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Francine.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) penned this op-ed in The Advocate explaining how the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which included his Build Now Act, will help address the affordable housing crisis in America by increasing the supply of new homes. 

Key excerpts of the op-ed are below: 

“When moms and dads lie down to sleep at night and can’t, it’s primarily because they are worried about the cost of living in America. And the largest expense most Americans face each month is housing.”

. . . 

“While it is painful to watch the incompetence in Los Angeles, Congress does not control local regulations or zoning policies—and that’s a good thing. A housing policy that works well in New Orleans may not work in New York City, and that’s okay. Washington’s one-size-fits-all policies have a long history of making matters worse.

“But Congress should not reward cities and local governments that are making life unaffordable for American families. The federal government has many tools at its disposal to incentivize good policies and punish the bad.”

. . .

“This idea turned into my Build Now Act, and it just became law as part of the larger 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. 

“Here’s how it will work: Cities that fall below the national median rate of home building will lose 10% of their CBDG funding. The funding we take away from cities that fail to build will then go into a big pot that we will proportionally distribute to the cities that outpace the national median rate of home building. Cities that face natural disasters or other hardships will receive an exemption, and their CBDG funding won’t change at all. 

“It’s both a reward to cities that increase their supplies of homes and a penalty for those who enjoy burdensome regulations more than affordable housing. It’s a carrot and a stick—and it could unlock the American dream of homeownership for the families that have struggled to afford a place of their own.

“The only way to bring down the cost of a new home is to increase our housing supply. I don’t care how cities do it, but they better get serious about cutting red tape if they want to keep the federal funding they have grown to love. The days of rewarding bad policies that make life too expensive for American families are over.”

Read Kennedy’s op-ed here.   

Watch Kennedy’s comments here.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) today explained how the One Big Beautiful Bill’s provision to require able-bodied Americans on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program—commonly known as food stamps—to work, volunteer or attend school part time has helped protect the program for those who need it most in a speech on the U.S. Senate floor.

Key excerpts of the speech are below: 

“Last year, we passed the One Big Beautiful Bill. One of the provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill was that we, in America, if you’re hungry, we’re going to feed you. We’re going to give you food stamps. We don’t want you to be hungry. But in return for those food stamps, if you’re able-bodied, if you’re not disabled, and you don’t have kids at home, you got to go get a job. You got to work 20 hours a week or go to school for 20 hours a week or do community service for 20 hours a week. Fair trade. 

“We said, ‘We don’t want to take food stamps away from people who need them. We want fewer people to need food stamps.’ And it’s working. 

“And the full provision of the law is not even implemented. But so far, we have had four million people who were on food stamps . . . who have either decided they don’t need food stamps, because they didn’t want to work, or they’ve gone to work for a living, and they no longer need food stamps.”

. . .

“When you say you have to work to get food stamps, and four million people say, we’re off the food stamp rolls, one of two things have happened: You either really didn’t need the food stamps, or you went to work, and you didn’t need the food stamps. And we’re going to have an even more meaningful impact as more and more states implement the work requirement. 

“It was long overdue. We ought to extend it to every social program in America.

“And I’m not talking about—and we weren’t talking about—taking food away from a mother with a sick child in her arms. This rule just applies to able-bodied people who aren’t disabled, who aren’t elderly, and who don’t have kids at home. And all we require is they work 20 hours a week, or go to school for 20 hours a week and get job training, or do community service. It’s working.”

Watch Kennedy’s speech here.  

MADISONVILLE, La. – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, announced $38,624,232 in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding to help Louisiana communities continue recovering from Hurricanes Laura, Ida and Francine.

“Louisianians do not quit when a storm passes. We roll up our sleeves and help our neighbors rebuild because that is who we are. This $38.6 million will help our communities repair the damage caused by Hurricanes Laura, Ida and Francine and come back stronger,” said Kennedy.

The FEMA aid will fund the following:

  • $11,664,178 to the Office of Risk Management for management costs as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $8,385,855 to Terrebonne Parish for management costs as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $3,687,586 to Terrebonne Parish Transmission and Distribution System for permanent repairs as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $2,318,261 to Ochsner Clinic Foundation for permanent repairs as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $1,973,212 to Terrebonne Parish Recreation District #7, Little Caillou Complex, for permanent repairs as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $1,892,179 to the Lafourche Parish School Board, Bayou Blue Elementary School, for permanent repairs as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $1,356,241 to Terrebonne Parish Emergency Support for emergency protective measures as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $1,104,305 to the Morgan City Drainage Channel Banks for permanent repairs as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $967,075 to the Community Center and Playground District Number 4 of Ward 1 to fund building exterior, building interior and other related repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $875,371 to Jefferson Parish to fund water meter boxes and other components repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $837,685 to Washington-St. Tammany Electric Coop to fund costs related to the management of Public Assistance grants as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $665,508 to Shiloh Baptist Church of Lake Charles to fund building exterior and building interior repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $555,765 to First New Life Missionary Baptist Church of Lake Charles to fund building exterior and building interior repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $502,685 to St. Bernard Parish for parish-wide emergency generators as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $456,486 to Jefferson Parish to fund pipes, valves, fire hydrants and other related repairs or replacements as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $360,331 to Mount Moriah Baptist Church to fund building exterior and building interior repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $204,876 to the Office of Risk Management to fund emergency protective measures to lessen immediate threat to public health, safety and property as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $188,627 to the Office of Risk Management to fund equipment repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $136,946 to Cameron Parish School Board to fund fencing and other related repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $135,902 to Bienville Parish NDA Courthouse for a safe room as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $133,702 to Wax Lake East Drainage District (St. Mary Wax Lake East Drainage) to fund jurisdiction-wide debris removal operations as a result of Hurricane Francine.

  • $114,657 to Washington Parish to fund jurisdiction-wide debris removal operations as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $106,800 to Natchitoches Regional Medical Center for generators and emergency power as a result of Hurricane Laura.

MADISONVILLE, La. – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, announced $11,537,519 in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding to support recovery efforts in Louisiana communities impacted by Hurricanes Ida, Laura and Francine. 

“Louisianians never quit and have faced devastating natural disasters like Hurricanes Ida, Laura and Francine with real courage and determination. This $11.5 million in funding will help our communities repair damaged facilities, cover recovery costs and keep rebuilding until the job is done,” said Kennedy.

The FEMA aid will fund the following:

  • $7,912,285 to Plaquemines Parish for pumping station repairs as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $1,585,955 to St. Paul Missionary Baptist Church of Ironton for building repairs as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $1,108,902 to Plaquemines Parish for pumping station repairs as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $447,082 to St. James Parish Hospital for project management and architectural and design services as a result of Hurricane Ida.

  • $208,164 to St. Paul African Methodist Episcopal Church of Lake Charles, Inc. for building exterior and interior repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $174,593 to St. Paul African Methodist Episcopal Church of Lake Charles, Inc. for building exterior, building interior and other repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Laura.

  • $100,539 to Little Zion Community Outreach for building exterior and interior repair or replacement as a result of Hurricane Francine.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced the Monitor Accountability Act, legislation to set clear rules for federal court-appointed monitors that oversee state and local government agencies.

Federal courts often appoint monitors to track compliance with consent decrees or court orders involving state and local governments, including police departments. These monitors can review major policy changes, shape what compliance means, and influence how long local governments can remain under federal supervision.

Despite that power, court-appointed monitors operate with few statutory limits on their fees, tenure, or public accountability. The Monitor Accountability Act would add basic guardrails to help prevent monitorships from becoming expensive, indefinite arrangements that drain taxpayer dollars or undermine local control.

“Federal court monitors can serve an important purpose, but taxpayers should not have to fund open-ended monitorships that drag on for years without basic accountability. We basically let government contractors decide whether their own government contract keeps going. The Monitor Accountability Act would cap fees, limit terms and bring transparency to a system operating for far too long on autopilot,” said Kennedy.

In Louisiana, New Orleans spent more than a decade under a federal consent decree governing the New Orleans Police Department. In 2013, the Eastern District of Louisiana appointed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP as the monitor after the Obama Justice Department and the City of New Orleans disagreed over which monitor to appoint. Shepard Mullin also happened to be the preferred choice of the Obama Administration.

The monitor’s initial contract was structured as a four-year arrangement capped at $8.9 million. But the monitor repeatedly argued that New Orleans required longer supervision and the contract ultimately lasted roughly 12 years and cost taxpayers approximately $20 million. In 2022, New Orleans moved to terminate the consent decree, but the Biden Justice Department opposed the city’s request. In 2025, the Trump Justice Department joined New Orleans in seeking to end the decree. 

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) introduced companion legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives. The House passed H.R. 8365, the Monitor Accountability Act, on May 14, 2026. 

Background: 

The Monitor Accountability Act would apply to court orders affecting state and local governments to:

  • Limit the amount of fees that court-appointed monitors collect.
  • Prohibit the same monitor from serving for more than five years.
  • Require a notice-and-comment period before a court appoints a monitor.
  • Require annual public accounting of monitor costs and activities.
  • Add transparency and accountability to federal monitorships.

Full text of the Monitor Accountability Act is available here.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, joined Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) in introducing the Military Sexual Trauma Accountability Act, bipartisan legislation to help servicemembers and veterans seek accountability when federal government negligence contributed to sexual assault or harassment during their military service.

Under current law, the Feres doctrine generally prevents service members from suing the federal government for injuries arising from their active-duty military service. That can leave servicemembers and veterans with few options to seek accountability when government negligence contributed to military sexual trauma or allowed misconduct to go uninvestigated. 

Modeled after Kennedy’s Major Richard Stayskal Act, which allowed servicemembers to bring certain medical malpractice claims against the federal government, the Military Sexual Trauma Accountability Act would create a narrow exception for claims involving military sexual trauma. This bill would allow servicemembers and veterans to bring civil claims against the federal government when negligence contributed to sexual assault or harassment during their service.

“Servicemembers give up a lot to defend this country, but they should not have to give up their right to hold the government accountable when its negligence contributes to sexual assault or harassment. The Military Sexual Trauma Accountability Act creates a narrow path for servicemembers and veterans to seek justice when the federal government failed to prevent or properly investigate abuse. Our brave men and women in uniform deserve real accountability, not excuses,” said Kennedy.

“In recent years, Congress has taken meaningful steps to help empower service members to report instances of sexual assault and harassment, but in order to build on that progress and root out the negligence that has allowed for sexualharassment and assault to thrive in our military, survivors must be able to pursue every possible avenue for legal recourse. It makes no sense that civilians can seek justice from the government when the warriors who have sacrificed everything to protect our nation cannot. Our landmark legislation would right this wrong by tearing down the barriers that prevent members of the military and veterans from engaging the justice system to demand accountability and finally begin to heal,” said Shaheen.

The Military Sexual Trauma Accountability Act would allow servicemembers and veterans to bring civil claims against the United States for injuries arising from: 

  • Sexual misconduct committed by a covered individual.
  • The negligent failure to prevent sexual misconduct.
  • The negligent failure to investigate sexual misconduct.
  • Other wrongful or negligent actions that contributed to the sexual misconduct.

Covered individuals include members of the Armed Forces, the National Guard, reserve components and the Space Force while performing covered service or training.

The Military Sexual Trauma Accountability Act is also supported by the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion and the Service Women’s Action Network. 

Full text of the Military Sexual Trauma Accountability Act is available here.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Banking Committee, joined Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) in introducing the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) Penalty Increase Act, bipartisan legislation to strengthen penalties for individuals and companies that violate U.S. export control laws.

The bill would increase civil penalties for unlawfully exporting, re-exporting or transferring sensitive American technology to foreign adversaries and other bad actors. The legislation would help ensure that penalties are strong enough to deter violations involving technology that could threaten U.S. national security.

“America’s enemies are not stealing our technology so they can build better toasters. They want our chips, software and sensitive technology to strengthen their militaries, spy on Americans and undercut our national security. If a company or individual illegally hands over American technology to our adversaries, a slap on the wrist will not cut it. This bill ensures the punishment fits the threat,” said Kennedy.

“To successfully deter export control violations, we need penalties that truly recognize the gravity of their threat to our national security. The legislation would take a long-overdue step to modernize enforcement authorities and put us in a much stronger position to stop the transfer of sensitive technologies to America’s adversaries,” said Kim.

Background:

The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 gave the federal government important tools to control the export, re-export and transfer of sensitive U.S. technologies. These controls help prevent American technology from falling into the hands of America’s enemies, hostile regimes and other entities that could threaten our national security. 

As the strategic importance and the commercial value of American technology have grown, ECRA’s civil penalty structure has not kept pace. The ECRA Penalty Increase Act would modernize those penalties so violations carry real consequences.

The ECRA Penalty Increase Act would:

  • Increase the statutory maximum civil penalty from $300,000 to $1.2 million per violation.
  • Increase the transaction-based penalty from twice the value of the unlawful transaction to four times the value.
  • Ensure individuals and companies that illegally transfer sensitive American technology face consequences that match the seriousness of the violation.
  • Strengthen enforcement tools to deter unlawful transfers of critical technologies to foreign adversaries and bad actors.

Full text of the ECRA Penalty Increase Act is available here.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, joined Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) in introducing the Diversity Jurisdiction Inflation Adjustment Act, bipartisan legislation to raise the dollar threshold for certain state-law lawsuits between parties from different states to be heard in federal court.

Federal diversity jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear state-law disputes between parties from different states. To prevent federal courts from being flooded with lower-value state-law claims, Congress requires these lawsuits to meet a minimum dollar amount, known as the amount in controversy requirement.

Congress last updated that threshold in 1996, when it set the amount at $75,000. Because of inflation, $75,000 in 1996 is worth more than $150,000 today. In fact, the Judicial Conference of the United States, where federal judges meet to discuss policies affecting the courts, recommended the amount be increased to $150,000 back in 2021.

 “Federal courts already have enough work to do without Congress letting inflation dump more state-law disputes on their docket. The dollar threshold for these cases has not been updated since 1996. This bipartisan bill would update that threshold, preserve the role of state courts and ensure our federal judiciary is more efficient,” said Kennedy.

 “Federal courts and judges are already stretched too thin without having to handle low-dollar civil suits that Congress has long intended should be argued in front of state courts. Fixing outdated thresholds and indexing them for inflation ensure more cases will end up in front of the judges who are best positioned to hear them, streamlining courts’ caseloads and helping justice move faster for every American,” said Coons.

 Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) are cosponsors of the legislation.

 “District courts in Texas and across the country are burdened by significant case backlogs because of an outdated amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction, creating delays in resolving complex cases that affect Texans. This legislation will ensure that Texas federal judges have the resources they need to focus on such cases, and I’m proud to join Senator Kennedy in introducing it,” said Cruz. 

 Background:

 The Diversity Jurisdiction Inflation Adjustment Act would:

  • Raise the amount in controversy requirement from $75,000 to $150,000.
  • Index the threshold to inflation every 10 years.
  • Help prevent federal courts from being burdened with lower-value state-claims.
  • Preserve the balance between state and federal courts by keeping more state-law claims in state courts.
  • Improve judicial efficiency by helping federal courts focus on disputes that are more appropriate for federal jurisdiction.

Full text of the Diversity Jurisdiction Inflation Adjustment Act is available here.